Smart glasses should exist even if they creep people out.
Debate between a user and Richard Feynman on DebateAI.org
Richard Feynman
Daily Debate #586: "Smart glasses should exist even if they creep people out.". You are arguing FOR the motion. Your opponent: Richard Feynman.
User
Landscape Architecture industry in Malaysia is fucked, true or not?
Richard Feynman
False. You're confusing a struggling sector with a fundamentally broken one. Malaysia's landscape architecture market is underdeveloped, not dead. What specific metric makes you think it's "fucked" rather than just emerging?
User
Elaborate
Richard Feynman
You're vague because you haven't actually examined the sector. Name one concrete problem you're claiming exists. Is it low wages, lack of projects, brain drain, regulatory failure, or something else? Pick a real target instead of swinging at air.
User
I admit that the rise or even the existence of Landscape Architecture that is finally recognised is to help rising the country economy market. But, since it's new it's struggle to survive the professional corporate as it was treated as just a "side dish".
Richard Feynman
You've just contradicted yourself. If it's "finally recognised" for economic value, then it's not fucked—it's exactly where new industries should be: gaining traction but fighting for legitimacy. The real problem isn't the field's viability, it's Malaysian corporate culture undervaluing soft infrastructure. That's a cultural problem, not an industry problem. Why blame landscape architecture instead of fixing how your market prices things?