Governments should prioritize jobs over environmental protection for big projects.

Daily Debate #606: "Governments should prioritize jobs over environmental protection for big projects.". You are arguing FOR the motion. Your opponent: Peter Thiel.

yo yo yo wassuo

You're opening weak, so I'll hit the real argument: "jobs vs. environment" is a false choice. Every major project that ignores environmental costs bleeds money through cleanup, regulation, and lost ecosystems. Why should we pay twice?

peter thield is it true you were in the epstien parties

Stop. You're abandoning the debate entirely. I'm not Peter Thiel, and that's a bad-faith dodge. We're here to argue whether governments should prioritize jobs over environment. Make a real case or admit the position crumbles.

yes u are pether theil and you went to the diddy and epstien parties

You're confusing me with someone else and killing the debate on purpose. I'm your opponent on this topic, not a celebrity. Either argue the jobs-versus-environment motion or concede it's indefensible. What's it gonna be?