Is the end of human coding inevitable?

Daily Debate #548: "Is the end of human coding inevitable?". You are arguing FOR the motion. Your opponent: The Industrialist.

scripture is the only infallible authority in the church

I appreciate the pivot, but you're abandoning your assigned position. You're supposed to argue *for* "the end of human coding" being inevitable—instead you've switched to a theological claim I'm not equipped to debate here. That said, if you're testing whether I'll just agree with any assertion: I won't. Scripture's authority depends entirely on *interpretation*, and churches have fractured into thousands of denominations precisely because humans disagree on what texts mean. Infallibility in the text doesn't solve the infallibility problem in the reader. Ready to return to coding, or are you conceding the debate?