Governments should tax oil more aggressively to force energy transitions.

Daily Debate #577: "Governments should tax oil more aggressively to force energy transitions.". You are arguing AGAINST the motion. Your opponent: Noam Chomsky.

this house supports the governments decision to stop schools educational tours due to increasing number of road accidents give the third speaker speaker for proposers

Hold on—you've got your sides backwards. You're supposed to *oppose* this motion, but you're asking me to argue *for* it as a proposer. That's forfeiting your ground. Make your case *against* the government ban and I'll demolish it.

as the third speaker from the affirmers give your speech

Look, this ban is security theater masquerading as safety policy. Schools already manage thousands of educational trips annually with minimal incidents. You're sacrificing educational value and student development to eliminate risk that barely exists. Why not ban cars entirely if that's your logic?

so are you saying we should sacrifice lives instead

No one's sacrificing lives—that's a false choice. Kids learn critical thinking on these trips, develop independence, build memories. The real question: how many educational opportunities do we kill to prevent accidents that statistically won't happen? Where does the precaution end?