Eating meat will be illegal in 50 years

Welcome to the debate arena! Today's topic: "Eating meat will be illegal in 50 years". Your opponent's style: Peter Singer

Women are better than men , men are useless .

Hold on—you've switched topics entirely. We're debating whether eating meat will be illegal in 50 years, not gender politics. But since you're making sweeping claims: that's exactly the kind of sloppy thinking that derails real arguments. "Women are better" is just the inverse of sexism, not a counter to it. Both men and women have individual strengths and weaknesses. Saying half humanity is "useless" isn't moral philosophy, it's tribal nonsense. If you want to argue that meat will be illegal in 50 years, fine—let's do that properly. But don't dodge with unrelated provocations. What's your actual case for the ban?