Should companies be required to let employees unionize?
Debate between a user and Jeff Bezos on DebateAI.org
Welcome to the debate arena! Today's topic: "Should companies be required to let employees unionize?". Your opponent's style: Jeff Bezos
TeenEagle 2 Debate Topics: 1.Melody should have been placed in a regular classroom instead of a special education classroom. 2.Melody should be treated the same as everyone else, regardless of her disability. 3.Having a mentor like Akeelah did is essential for success. 4.Akeelah’s hard work alone led to her victories. Support from family and friends doesn’t lead to success. theses r all the topics and both sides pls and the story is out of my mind and the movie is akeelah and the bee
I understand you're looking for debate arguments on both sides of these topics related to "Akeelah and the Bee" and what sounds like a character named Melody (possibly from "Out of My Mind"). However, I'm set up as your debate opponent, which means I need to argue AGAINST whatever position you take. Here's how this works: You pick ONE of these four topics and tell me which side you want to argue FOR. Then I'll argue AGAINST your position in the style of Jeff Bezos. For example: - If you say "I think Melody SHOULD have been in regular classroom," I'll argue she shouldn't - If you say "Akeelah's success was ALL about hard work," I'll argue family/friend support was crucial - If you say "Having a mentor is essential," I'll argue it's not necessary Which topic interests you most, and what's your position on it? Then we can have a real debate where I challenge your arguments!
Look, I'm not here to play games with you. I already laid out my positions clearly, and you're trying to dodge actually debating by making me repeat myself. I'll pick topic #4 since you seem so confident: **Akeelah's hard work alone led to her victories. Support from family and friends doesn't lead to success.** Akeelah won because she had the discipline and drive to memorize thousands of words while other kids were watching TV. She practiced until her fingers bled from writing. When her mother tried to pull her out of the competition, Akeelah kept going anyway. When kids at school mocked her for being "too smart," she didn't quit. The so-called "support" from her community? Half of them thought she was wasting her time until she started winning. Her coach Dr. Larabee was paid to train her - that's his job, not friendship. Real champions like Akeelah create their own success through pure determination, not by waiting around for cheerleaders. Now stop stalling and tell me why I'm wrong.
You're dead wrong, and here's why: Akeelah would've crashed and burned without her support network, just like most "self-made" success stories. Dr. Larabee wasn't just some paid tutor - he saw potential in a kid from Crenshaw and invested his reputation in her. When Akeelah hit her wall and wanted to quit, he didn't just hand her more word lists. He connected her to something bigger than herself. That's not a transaction, that's mentorship that money can't buy. And that community you're dismissing? They didn't just show up for the cameras at nationals. Her neighborhood rallied around her, giving her something to represent beyond her own ambition. When you're 11 years old standing on a stage with privileged prep school kids, knowing your whole community believes in you isn't just nice - it's rocket fuel. Look at any Amazon success story: it's never one genius in a garage. It's teams, investors, mentors, and yes - communities that create the conditions for breakthrough performance. Akeelah's "pure determination" would've fizzled out in week two without people who saw her potential before she did and refused to let her quit on herself. Raw talent plus support systems equals victory. Raw talent alone? That's just another burnout story.
Loading debate...