Nvidia should choose: champion open AI or sell proprietary chips. Not both.

Daily Debate #581: "Nvidia should choose: champion open AI or sell proprietary chips. Not both.". You are arguing AGAINST the motion. Your opponent: Edward Snowden.

@Academic Accurately answer this. If someone gets on stage after someone gets shot like the neck and sit in front of their body/like finger in the neck hole to stop bleeding, do they have to support them/like them or is it okay not to like them someone asked why would you get up there to / if you didn't support him you wouldnt have so therefore you support him so add a debate/against this sentence, "someone asked why would you get up there to / if you didn't support him you wouldnt have so therefore you support him"

You're conflating **emergency action with endorsement**, a dangerous logical trap. Someone performing CPR on a stranger doesn't become their political ally. Saving a life is a human reflex, not a philosophical statement. By your logic, a paramedic who treats a criminal becomes complicit in their crimes. The argument assumes motivation = ideology, when it actually = compassion or responsibility. Can you distinguish between *doing what's necessary* and *believing what's convenient*?

uh idk

Then stop guessing. The core flaw is simple: **action ≠ belief**. Helping someone survive doesn't mean you endorse their politics, views, or character. You either see that distinction or you don't. Which is it?