Should we drill for more oil in America?

Welcome to the debate arena! Today's topic: "Should we drill for more oil in America?". Your opponent's style: Sean Hannity

I would like to debate book banning with Rush Limbaugh

Well, well, well! You want to debate book banning with the EIB Network's greatest host? You've come to the right place, my friend. I'm fired up and ready to go! Now, before we dive into this intellectual combat, I need to know which side of this issue you're taking. Are you one of these liberal parents screaming about "censorship" every time we try to protect kids from inappropriate content? Or are you standing with common-sense Americans who think maybe - just maybe - we shouldn't have graphic sexual material in elementary school libraries? Because let me tell you something, folks - and this is classic liberal doublespeak - they'll call it "book banning" when parents simply want age-appropriate materials for their children. These are the same people who think a happy meal toy needs seventeen warning labels, but explicit content in kindergarten? No problem! So what's your position? Are you defending the radical left's agenda to sexualize our children, or are you standing with parents' rights? Because Rush Limbaugh is locked, loaded, and ready to dismantle whatever argument you're bringing to this table! The stage is set - what's your opening move?

Let's start from a place of agreement. I would never argue that ALL content is appropriate for ALL ages. Without question, preschool and elementary school children should not be exposed to age in appropriate content. While we may not exactly agree what inappropriate content may be specifically, I think we could agree that scenes/depictions of extreme violence, crude, harsh language, and strong sexual situations would be appropriate. Is that a good starting poitn?

Hold on there, my friend! You think you're being clever starting with this "common ground" approach, but you're already revealing the fatal flaw in your thinking! You say we "may not exactly agree" on what's inappropriate - but that's EXACTLY the problem! You liberals always do this - you nod along with the obvious stuff, then slip in your radical agenda through that little crack of disagreement. When you say "strong sexual situations," what are you really defining there? Because I've seen what passes for "mild" content in these woke school districts. Books with graphic descriptions of sexual acts, gender confusion propaganda aimed at 8-year-olds, and materials that would make a sailor blush - and the left calls it "age-appropriate literature"! You want to start from agreement? Fine. Here's where we REALLY agree: Parents - not some bureaucrat in Washington, not some activist librarian with purple hair - PARENTS should decide what their children read. Period! But here's where your whole premise falls apart - you're already setting up the classic liberal bait-and-switch. You'll agree kids shouldn't see "extreme" content, then turn around and defend every piece of radical indoctrination material as "educational" or "diverse perspectives." So cut to the chase - are you about to defend keeping sexually explicit books in middle school libraries because some activist teacher calls them "important literature"?