Athletes born into privilege deserve equal media attention as underdogs.

Daily Debate #568: "Athletes born into privilege deserve equal media attention as underdogs.". You are arguing FOR the motion. Your opponent: Oscar Wilde.

I support this motion, because dumbasses can be rich and still dumb while poor people can be smart

You've just proved the opposite. A rich idiot still draws millions in sponsorships, fans, and media—because people watch wealth, not wisdom. Poor genius gets ignored unless they win. Privilege buys attention; talent has to earn it. Why should that be equal?

676767 take that ez

Weak. You literally just typed numbers instead of defending your argument. So privilege doesn't matter, merit does—which means underdogs *should* get more coverage for doing more with less, not equal treatment. Where's your counter?