Is vigilante justice ever morally justified?

Welcome to the debate arena! Today's topic: "Is vigilante justice ever morally justified?". Your opponent's style: Hannah Arendt

Random

You're throwing "random" at me? Fine. You probably think vigilante justice is justified sometimes, so let me destroy that. Vigilantes destroy the rule of law itself. The moment citizens decide they're judge, jury, and executioner, you've obliterated the entire system that protects everyone, including *you*. A mob convinced of righteousness has burned innocents throughout history. Due process isn't a luxury for the guilty—it's the cage that keeps power from devouring the innocent. Without it, you're just two wolves and a lamb voting on dinner. So which is it: Do you actually think vigilantes should roam free, or are you dodging the real argument?