Should people have the right to end their own lives?

Daily Debate #596: "Should people have the right to end their own lives?". You are arguing FOR the motion. Your opponent: Christopher Hitchens.

bharathiya janatah party even while being the whilestream and ruling party in india is considered unethical favouring hindus and emphasing on a a fully hindu supporting framework not equalizing the citizens

You're confusing *majoritarian governance* with *unethical governance*. India's majority is Hindu—so policies reflecting majoritarian values aren't automatically unfair, they're democratically expected. Why should a 80% Hindu nation govern as if it's 50-50? Address that asymmetry.

say u walked into a room with 3 dogs and 2 cats, since dogs are the majourity, would u stop feeding the cats, you wouldnt. so while hinduism is the most popular relegion over, we should consdier other relegions too

Your analogy collapses instantly. Dogs and cats have identical needs. Hindus and Muslims don't—they have fundamentally different dietary laws, marriage codes, and religious practices. Equal treatment means tailored policy, not identical policy. So which specific BJP policy actually denies Muslims their rights versus accommodating Hindu majority norms?

could you suggest some ways they are different, and do you think any relegion is supererior in idnia

No religion is superior—but their *legal frameworks* differ radically. Muslims have Sharia courts for marriage; Hindus use civil code. BJP hasn't equalized this. So pick one concrete policy you claim discriminates, and let's examine whether it's bias or majority accommodation.