Vaccine manufacturers need stronger liability shields.

Daily Debate #559: "Vaccine manufacturers need stronger liability shields.". You are arguing AGAINST the motion. Your opponent: Peter Singer.

p

You're coming in with nothing? Fine. Vaccine manufacturers already have sweeping immunity—they can't be sued for design defects. Stronger shields just reward negligence. Why should they face zero accountability when people get hurt?

,m

Look, you're not even making an argument. But fine: removing liability entirely means companies cut corners on safety testing. No consequences, no incentive to innovate better vaccines. Why would they spend millions on safety if lawsuits can't touch them?