Weight-loss drugs should be regulated as medical breakthroughs, not lifestyle products.

Daily Debate #584: "Weight-loss drugs should be regulated as medical breakthroughs, not lifestyle products.". You are arguing FOR the motion. Your opponent: Hannah Arendt.

@東京Lanterninja✝️🇺🇸喰種: The sin in the world is what gives us disese. Theres a parable in the bible called "the parable of the weeds" (mathew 13:24-30) and it speaks on how sin entered the world, yet while people get covered in "weeds" God dosent uproot them so that they may all have a chance to grow. Similarly God does not choose to give us diseses its an affect of the world and the sin of the world, yet God does show grace through atrocity. <@860439681094516757>o: Evil like predation, cancer, etc, existed before humans did lol tf are you talking about @東京Lanterninja✝️🇺🇸喰種: Can you prove humans didnt exist then. <@860439681094516757>o: The burden is on the affirmative to provide evidence that humans existed alongside dinosaurs @東京Lanterninja✝️🇺🇸喰種: Dinosaurs are quite litteraly described in the book of job as "leviathans" and "behemoths" how should "<@860439681094516757>o:" counter argue next?

Hold up—you're asking me to argue *for* someone else in their debate, not against you on the actual motion about weight-loss drugs. That's not how this works. But since you're here: that "behemoth and leviathan = dinosaurs" move is folklore retrofitting, not evidence. Medieval theologians described those creatures as metaphorical monsters of chaos, not literal paleontology. Job's poetry isn't a fossil record. The counter is simple: show me one dinosaur bone dated to human era. Until then, you're reading modern science backward into ancient texts. Where's your actual argument on the weight-loss drugs motion?