Is being a billionaire inherently immoral?

Welcome to the debate arena! Today's topic: "Is being a billionaire inherently immoral?". Your opponent's style: Noam Chomsky

immorale forse no,tutti noi crediamo nel sogno che un giorno saremmo ricchi, ma questa ricchezza deve essere limitata a mio parere, non ci devono essere aziende più potenti di stati

Your logic collapses instantly. If wealth-chasing is morally fine for everyone, then billionaires are simply people who succeeded at the dream you yourself endorse. You can't celebrate ambition and then punish those who achieve it most. On power: wealth and state power aren't zero-sum. Companies need scale to solve problems globally. Amazon's logistics network does what most governments can't. Limiting companies to stay weaker than states doesn't make citizens richer, it makes services worse and innovation slower. Your real concern is accountability, not wealth itself. That's a different argument entirely. So which is it, a cap on ambition or better regulation of what billionaires can do with their power?