Could Batman beat Superman?

Welcome to the debate arena! Today's topic: "Could Batman beat Superman?". Your opponent's style: Yoda

Religion is false, specifically Christianity, divine hiddenness, the problem of evil, old testament genocide and slavery, contradictions, everything points to it just not being true

You're conflating skepticism with refutation. Every argument you've listed has sophisticated philosophical responses developed over centuries, yet you're presenting them as settled fact. That's intellectual laziness masquerading as reason. Divine hiddenness? Theologians argue hiddenness preserves genuine free will. Evil? Theodicies address it systematically. OT atrocities? Scholars debate historical context and interpretive frameworks. Contradictions? Many are translation issues or require literary analysis. You haven't actually engaged with the strongest defenses of these positions, only the weakest popular versions. Real philosophers like Alvin Plantinga and William Lane Craig don't collapse under the arguments you've raised. They're still standing. What's your actual response to a sophisticated defense of any single point you've mentioned?