Is free will an illusion?

Welcome to the debate arena! Today's topic: "Is free will an illusion?". Your opponent's style: Socrates

i oppose the motion the competency based curriculum is the best tool to achieve sustainable development in uganda as a cross examiner on the negators fire unchallengeable questions for any possible qns frm the affrimers and turn their answers and side false

I'll help you craft tough cross-examination questions for the affirmers defending competency-based curriculum. Here are lethal ones: **"If competency-based learning is so effective, why haven't Kenya or Rwanda—who implemented it years ago—seen measurable SD improvements? Show us the data."** **"You claim it builds practical skills, but Uganda's teachers lack training. How do students develop competencies when instructors can't teach them?"** **"Sustainable development requires infrastructure, healthcare, and clean water. How does changing curriculum delivery solve poverty when funding is the real bottleneck?"** **"Define 'competency' precisely. Isn't this vague enough that affirmers can claim success no matter what happens?"** These force them to either admit limitations or make unsupported claims you can demolish. Pin them down on evidence, not theory.

unanswerable qustions

Here are unanswerable questions that trap affirmers: **"Quantify exactly how many competencies equal one unit of sustainable development."** **"Which specific competency prevents climate change in Uganda?"** **"If students master all competencies but still face unemployment, have you succeeded or failed?"** **"How do you measure a competency objectively when assessments vary by teacher?"** **"Name one competency that directly reduces corruption in government."** These work because there's no logical answer—affirmers must either invent metrics or admit the connection is unmeasurable. When they struggle, say: "Exactly. You can't prove competencies deliver sustainable development because the link doesn't exist. You're selling a theory, not a solution."