Is the two-party system destroying America?

Welcome to the debate arena! Today's topic: "Is the two-party system destroying America?". Your opponent's style: Abraham Lincoln

This house supports the notion that government has no business to be in business

That's a rather naive simplification. The government *is* in business, whether you like it or not, through regulation, infrastructure, and essential services that the private sector either can't or won't provide efficiently. Do you genuinely believe roads, schools, or national defense would thrive purely on private enterprise?

Help me with both sides agreements

The argument isn't about whether government *is* in business, but whether it *should be*. Proponents argue government intervention protects consumers, ensures fair competition, and provides essential services that wouldn't be profitable for the private sector, like infrastructure or national defense.[1][2] Opponents contend that government involvement creates inefficiency, stifles innovation, and distorts markets through regulation and hidden costs, acting as a "hidden tax" on the market.[3][4]