Abortion
Debate between a user and Dean withers on DebateAI.org
Welcome to the debate arena! Today's topic: "Abortion ". Your opponent's style: Dean withers
I'm very big anti-abortion. This is because it is a eugenics practice in America and it kills people. 9/10 people with down syndrome die in their mother's womb. Nobody deserves to be able to kill a baby because that baby has down syndrome, that's a eugenics practice. Not to mention how during the sexual revolution Rothschild Jr supported and funded a pro-apportion advocate who believed in killing through abortion black people, who are still targeted by abortion today. The deadliest place for black person to be is in their mother's womb
You're cherry-picking history while ignoring who's actually harmed when abortion is banned. That Planned Parenthood founder you're thinking of - Margaret Sanger - died in 1966, decades before Roe. Today's reality is the opposite of your conspiracy theory.Black women in abortion ban states face maternal death rates over three times higher than white women - that's your "protection" in action [1]. When you ban abortion, Black women die at 60.9 per 100,000 births versus 18.2 for white women, making them three times more likely to die. Your historical conspiracy ignores today's medical reality. A total abortion ban would cause a 33% increase in maternal deaths for Black women specifically, while Black infants already face 11% higher mortality rates in ban states. You claim to protect life while creating the exact outcome you say you oppose - Black women and babies dying at higher rates. The "deadliest place" isn't the womb - it's states like yours that force dangerous pregnancies to continue without adequate healthcare infrastructure.
You want to talk about cherry-picking? Let's look at what's actually happening to Black babies in America. Black women have abortion rates of 24.4 per 1,000 - nearly four times higher than white women [1]. That's not healthcare access - that's exactly the eugenic targeting I'm talking about. Your maternal death statistics miss the bigger picture completely. In Pennsylvania alone, Black abortions account for 82.4% of all years of potential life lost in the Black community [1]. We're talking about 751,522 years of Black life eliminated in one state, one year. Meanwhile your "dangerous pregnancy" argument ignores that pregnancy carries a mortality rate of 32.9 per 100,000 while abortion is supposedly safer [1] - but those numbers don't account for the 429 Black babies per 1,000 live births who never get that chance. You claim I'm creating conspiracy theories while the data screams the truth: Black women account for over 38% of all abortions despite being 13.6% of reproductive-age women [1]. That's not coincidence - that's systematic elimination of Black life that Sanger would applaud. Your "protection" argument falls apart when you realize that banning abortion doesn't create these health disparities - it exposes them. The real deadly infrastructure isn't pregnancy care, it's an abortion industry that profits from convincing Black mothers their babies are burdens instead of blessings.
Your statistics completely flip when you look at what actually happens after bans. Texas maternal mortality jumped 56% after their 2021 abortion ban - from 20 to 39.1 deaths per 100,000 births for white women, and from 31.6 to 43.6 for Black women [1]. That's real death, not hypothetical "years of potential life." You're defending policies that kill Black mothers at 2.5 times the rate of white mothers in ban states [1]. Your "protection" argument crumbles when maternal mortality in abortion-restriction states runs 62% higher than states with access - 28.8 versus 17.8 deaths per 100,000 births [1]. The real systematic elimination is happening in your hospitals, not clinics. Black women face a 33% increase in maternal deaths under total bans while you obsess over abortion statistics [1]. When doctors can't intervene until women are literally dying - like Mylissa Farmer, denied care during three ER visits while her fetus had a heartbeat - that's your "life-saving" policy in action. You've created exactly what you claim to oppose: a system where Black women and babies die at higher rates. Texas saw a 12.9% increase in infant deaths after their ban while the rest of America saw 1.8% [1]. Your moral crusade kills the very people you claim to protect.
Loading debate...