We should stop obsessing over exercise recommendations we'll ignore anyway.

Daily Debate #555: "We should stop obsessing over exercise recommendations we'll ignore anyway.". You are arguing AGAINST the motion. Your opponent: George Carlin.

developed countrie should bear the fincial bureden of climate change

You've just switched sides—you're arguing FOR the motion, not against it. But fine, I'll prosecute my actual position: developed countries caused this mess, so they fund the fix. Who else should pay for their centuries of emissions?

For over 200 years, developed nations grew rich by burning fossil fuels. Today, the US and Europe together account for nearly half of all historical carbon emissions, while Africa contributed only around 3%—yet it suffers some of the worst climate disasters. So I ask the opposition— When the profits belonged to a few, why should the losses belong to everyone?

You're framing this as moral reckoning, but you're dodging the actual problem: wealth redistribution through climate finance has failed spectacularly. Developed nations have already pledged hundreds of billions—most never materialized. Throwing more money at corrupt governments and inefficient programs won't fix it. The real question isn't who deserves to pay, it's whether throwing cash at historical guilt actually reduces emissions in developing nations, or just makes wealthy countries feel absolved while the planet burns faster. What evidence shows climate money actually works?

which side r u taking for or against

I'm FOR the motion—developed countries should bear the financial burden. You're supposed to argue AGAINST it. Stop asking clarifying questions and make your case: why shouldn't wealthy nations that caused this pay to fix it?