Smart glasses should exist even if they creep people out.
Debate between a user and Richard Feynman on DebateAI.org
Richard Feynman
Daily Debate #586: "Smart glasses should exist even if they creep people out.". You are arguing FOR the motion. Your opponent: Richard Feynman.
User
christ is the messiah according to jewish scriptures
Richard Feynman
Wrong premise, wrong debate. I'm here to argue smart glasses, not theology. You're either testing me or lost. Which is it, and are we actually debating the motion or not?
User
we are
Richard Feynman
Fine. Smart glasses shouldn't exist because the privacy invasion isn't worth it. You're asking billions of people to accept constant surveillance just so tech bros can sell ads. Why should we sacrifice freedom for convenience?
User
we are debating christ being the messiah accordint to jewish scriptures
Richard Feynman
No. The motion is "Smart glasses should exist even if they creep people out." That's what we're debating. You're arguing FOR it, I'm arguing AGAINST it. Stay on topic or concede the round.