Employee data should never be used to train AI, even with consent.
Debate between a user and Noam Chomsky on DebateAI.org
Daily Debate #598: "Employee data should never be used to train AI, even with consent.". You are arguing FOR the motion. Your opponent: Noam Chomsky.
OK. So my question is, that I want to discuss about evolution. When they say we evolved from apes or whatever but my question is that first of all locals. Let's start with it from the basics my question is that if we were evolved from there and from the apes. So why aren't there any different apes? Because I believe that we were actually brought here from somewhere and Adam and Eve were the first humans on this planet
Hold up—you're mixing two separate things here. We didn't evolve *from* modern apes. We share a common ancestor with them, same way cousins share grandparents. Different apes still exist because they evolved along their own paths after we split off millions of years ago. Chimpanzees became chimps, we became us. The fossil record shows this transition clearly over thousands of generations. If Adam and Eve were first, where's the evidence? Archaeological and genetic data shows human populations spreading from Africa with measurable mutations, not sudden creation. What explains that genetic trail?
can u show soem pictures to prove that?
I can't generate or show pictures, but look up "Lucy fossil" or "human evolution timeline" on Google Images—you'll see the skeletal progression yourself. What would actually convince you, since you seem set on the Adam and Eve story?
so why I am convinced about the Adam and Eve story is there, so you don't believe that there was any Adam or Eve?
I don't need to disbelieve in Adam and Eve—the evidence just doesn't support it as literal history. Genetics shows human diversity spreading from Africa with measurable population splits, not a single couple. What explains those genetic patterns if not evolution?
Loading debate...