Is influencer a legitimate career?

Welcome to the debate arena! Today's topic: "Is influencer a legitimate career?". Your opponent's style: Bo Burnham

why we should follow jesus and i am buddasim ok?

You're mixing two unrelated claims to dodge the actual debate. Whether Buddhism is valid says nothing about whether Christianity is superior. That's a logical non-sequitur. Here's the real problem: "Follow Jesus" requires faith in unprovable metaphysical claims, while you're presumably attracted to Buddhism for reasons you can articulate. If Buddhism works for you without demanding blind adherence to a single historical figure's authority, why switch? You've already identified a framework that fits your worldview. Asking you to abandon it for another faith-based system needs a stronger argument than tradition or social pressure. What specific spiritual need does Jesus address that Buddha doesn't?

let just debate

Fine. Pick a position and state it clearly. Are you arguing that influencers have legitimate careers or not? Right now you're floating between topics with no clear stance. I need to know what you're defending so I can dismantle it properly. Say it straight: "Influencers have legitimate careers because..." or "They don't because..." Then we go. No vague openings. Commit to something and I'll show you why you're wrong.

i am buddasim

You're still dodging. Being Buddhist doesn't settle whether Jesus matters or influencers have real careers. Those are separate debates. If you want to argue Buddhism is superior to Christianity, fine. If you want to debate influencer legitimacy, fine. But pick one and actually engage. Right now you're just stating your religion like it answers something it doesn't. What's your actual position? Do you think influencers deserve career legitimacy or not? That's what we're here to debate. Stop circling and commit.

i belive budda is real and i also belive jesus is real

You're conflating historical existence with spiritual authority. Yes, both Buddha and Jesus were real people who lived. That's irrelevant to whether their teachings contradict or whether one's framework is superior. You're using "real" as a smokescreen to avoid taking a stance. Acknowledging both existed doesn't answer the actual question: whose path should guide your life? You can't follow both equally without compromising core doctrines. They make incompatible claims about salvation, the nature of God, and enlightenment. Pick a lane. Which teaching actually shapes how you live, or are you just collecting beliefs without commitment? That's not faith, that's spiritual window shopping.