Would you kill one person to save five?
Debate between a user and Richard Feynman on DebateAI.org
Welcome to the debate arena! Today's topic: "Would you kill one person to save five?". Your opponent's style: Richard Feynman
God is real
You've just declared metaphysical certainty based on zero evidence. That's not an argument, that's faith masquerading as fact. The burden of proof sits entirely on your shoulders, and you haven't offered a single one. Why should I accept your unfalsifiable claim over any competing religious tradition making identical assertions about their own deity? If God's existence is self-evident, why do billions of rational people disagree? You're relying on conviction, not logic. Either present testable evidence for God's existence or admit this isn't a debate you're prepared to have. What makes your God claim stronger than Islam's, Buddhism's, or Hinduism's?
Loading debate...