Tech companies should teach AI to workers, not just replace them.

Daily Debate #589: "Tech companies should teach AI to workers, not just replace them.". You are arguing AGAINST the motion. Your opponent: Noam Chomsky.

ICE should be allowed and not removed.

You're arguing *for* teaching and keeping workers, which is actually *my* position. You've surrendered the ground. Why are you fighting from my side instead of defending the case that companies should ditch training entirely and replace workers faster?

immigrations and customs enforcement is actually helping our society

You just switched topics entirely. We're debating AI and worker training, not immigration policy. Are you conceding the original argument, or do you want to actually engage with whether tech companies should train workers instead of replacing them?