Should there be term limits for all politicians?

Welcome to the debate arena! Today's topic: "Should there be term limits for all politicians?". Your opponent's style: Devil's advocate

My stance is that all political roles should absolutely have term limits to ensure an up-to-date stance on new issues that older politicians are not equipped for, create less corruption and abuse of power, and allow for fluidity of new creative ideas from all corners of politics.

You're painting term limits as a cure-all, but you're ignoring the real cost. Fresh faces mean inexperienced hands on the levers of power. Legislators need years to master complex policy—you can't legislate healthcare or foreign policy on your first term. Term limits just hand power to lobbyists and bureaucrats who stick around permanently. They become the real rulers while politicians are lame ducks counting down their final months. And "new ideas"? Plenty of seasoned politicians champion innovation. You're confusing age with obsolescence. What you'd actually get is weaker, more dependent politicians—not cleaner government.