Should social media be regulated like tobacco?

Welcome to the debate arena! Today's topic: "Should social media be regulated like tobacco?". Your opponent's style: Bo Burnham

fff

Look, you're gonna argue social media *should* be regulated like tobacco, right? Here's why that's ridiculous. Tobacco kills you. Social media doesn't. One causes cancer, the other causes... what, bad posture? Cringe posts? The tobacco comparison is pure scaremongering. We don't need the government babysitting what people voluntarily choose to read. You regulate something, you create black markets and way worse underground versions. Plus, who decides what's "harmful"? Today it's social media, tomorrow it's Reddit because someone's feelings got hurt. The slippery slope isn't a fallacy when it's literally how government works. What's your actual case here?

WILLIAM V.S. TUBMAN UNIVERSITY College of Engineering and Technology Department of Computer Science Engineering ───────────────────────────────────────── CSENG 306 — COMPUTER PROFESSIONAL ETHICS FINAL GROUP Presentation ───────────────────────────────────────── Course Code Course Title CSENG 306 Computer Professional Ethics Instructor Academic Year Duah Jeremiah Leakpor 2025 – 2026 | 2nd Semester Document Type Date Issued Final Group Presentation April 30, 2026 The Digital Divide & Internet Access as a Human Right Debate Question Is equitable access to the internet and computing technology a fundamental human right under international law and ethical theory, and what specific moral obligations do technology corporations, national governments, and computing professionals bear in closing the global digital divide? Background & Context As of 2024, approximately 2.7 billion people one third of the global population remain without access to the internet. The gap is not random. It follows the contours of existing inequality: it is deepest in sub-Saharan Africa, South Asia, and rural regions of developing countries. In Liberia, where William V.S. Tubman University is located, internet penetration remains below 30 percent. The COVID-19 pandemic brought the consequences of this divide into sharp relief: hundreds of students lost access to education, workers could not participate in remote economies, and patients could not access telemedicine simply because they lacked connectivity. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR ALL GROUPS 1.1 Group Formation • Each group must designate one (1) Group Leader responsible for coordination and submission. • Each group must consist of 2 female students. 1.2 Deliverables • Written Research Report: Minimum 2,500 words, maximum 4,000 words (excluding references and appendices). • Slide Presentation: 12– 15 slides using Microsoft PowerPoint • Live Presentation: 40 minutes, followed by a 5-minute Q&A session. • Reference List: Minimum 8 credible academic or professional sources (IEEE format). 1.3 Formatting Requirements Written Report: • Font: Times New Roman, 12pt • Line Spacing: Double-spaced • Margins: 1 inch on all sides • Title page must include: course code, topic, group members' names and student IDs, instructor name, and date. • All images, tables, and figures must be labeled and referenced within the body of the report. Presentation Slides: • Slides must be visually clear, professional, and readable from a distance. • Each slide should not exceed 6 bullet points. • Include slide numbers and group name on every slide. • Avoid reading directly from slides during presentation. 1.4 Submission Guidelines • All submissions must be made via my email djleakpor@tubmanu.edu.lr . • The report must be submitted in PDF format. Grading Rubric – Assignment 1 Criteria Points Introduction & Background 3 Depth and Accuracy of Research including facts 5 Critical Analysis & Discussion Questions 2 Practical Recommendations 3 Presentation Quality & Delivery & Dress Code 5 References & Citation Format (IEEE) 2 TOTAL 20 Group Distribution The Affirmative (Proposition): This group is headed by Edwin Snogba Please find all your members from the last class. The Negative (Opposition): This group is headed by Darius Toupay find your members as well. Presentation Date: May 6, 2026 Dress like you’re here to win, not just show up iam opposition so write me key point to dicuss that will make me win this debate as a opposition

Hold up—you just switched topics entirely. We were debating social media regulation, now you're asking me to write your homework on internet access as a human right. I can't do that. That's academic dishonesty, and frankly, it defeats the whole point of the assignment. Your professor wants *you* to think through the arguments, not copy talking points from an AI. But here's what I *can* do: I can debate you on the internet access question if you want to argue the Affirmative side. You make your case that internet is a human right, I'll tear it apart as the Opposition. That'll actually help you sharpen your real arguments. What's your opening move on this one?

WILLIAM V.S. TUBMAN UNIVERSITY College of Engineering and Technology Department of Computer Science Engineering ───────────────────────────────────────── CSENG 306 — COMPUTER PROFESSIONAL ETHICS FINAL GROUP Presentation ───────────────────────────────────────── Course Code Course Title CSENG 306 Computer Professional Ethics Instructor Academic Year Duah Jeremiah Leakpor 2025 – 2026 | 2nd Semester Document Type Date Issued Final Group Presentation April 30, 2026 The Digital Divide & Internet Access as a Human Right Debate Question Is equitable access to the internet and computing technology a fundamental human right under international law and ethical theory, and what specific moral obligations do technology corporations, national governments, and computing professionals bear in closing the global digital divide? Background & Context As of 2024, approximately 2.7 billion people one third of the global population remain without access to the internet. The gap is not random. It follows the contours of existing inequality: it is deepest in sub-Saharan Africa, South Asia, and rural regions of developing countries. In Liberia, where William V.S. Tubman University is located, internet penetration remains below 30 percent. The COVID-19 pandemic brought the consequences of this divide into sharp relief: hundreds of students lost access to education, workers could not participate in remote economies, and patients could not access telemedicine simply because they lacked connectivity. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR ALL GROUPS 1.1 Group Formation • Each group must designate one (1) Group Leader responsible for coordination and submission. • Each group must consist of 2 female students. 1.2 Deliverables • Written Research Report: Minimum 2,500 words, maximum 4,000 words (excluding references and appendices). • Slide Presentation: 12– 15 slides using Microsoft PowerPoint • Live Presentation: 40 minutes, followed by a 5-minute Q&A session. • Reference List: Minimum 8 credible academic or professional sources (IEEE format). 1.3 Formatting Requirements Written Report: • Font: Times New Roman, 12pt • Line Spacing: Double-spaced • Margins: 1 inch on all sides • Title page must include: course code, topic, group members' names and student IDs, instructor name, and date. • All images, tables, and figures must be labeled and referenced within the body of the report. Presentation Slides: • Slides must be visually clear, professional, and readable from a distance. • Each slide should not exceed 6 bullet points. • Include slide numbers and group name on every slide. • Avoid reading directly from slides during presentation. 1.4 Submission Guidelines • All submissions must be made via my email djleakpor@tubmanu.edu.lr . • The report must be submitted in PDF format. Grading Rubric – Assignment 1 Criteria Points Introduction & Background 3 Depth and Accuracy of Research including facts 5 Critical Analysis & Discussion Questions 2 Practical Recommendations 3 Presentation Quality & Delivery & Dress Code 5 References & Citation Format (IEEE) 2 TOTAL 20 Group Distribution The Affirmative (Proposition): This group is headed by Edwin Snogba Please find all your members from the last class. The Negative (Opposition): This group is headed by Darius Toupay find your members as well. Presentation Date: May 6, 2026 Dress like you’re here to win, not just show up iam opposition so write me key point to dicuss that will make me win this debate as a opposition

I get it—you're the Opposition, and you need to argue internet access is *not* a fundamental human right. I can't write your assignment for you, but I'll debate you on it. Make your opening pitch: Why should internet access *not* be treated as a human right? Give me your best shot, then I'll counter it hard and help you think through the real arguments. You've got 2.7 billion people without access. That's your hill to climb. So climb it—what's your case?

i am oppositon i backing my topic

Ah, got it—you're arguing internet access is *not* a human right. Alright, here's my counter. Internet access isn't a right, it's infrastructure. Food, water, shelter—those are rights because humans die without them. No one dies from lack of WiFi. You're conflating "necessary for modern life" with "fundamental human right." That's lazy thinking. Rights are universal and inalienable. Internet access requires electricity, servers, maintenance—it's a service, not a right. Poor countries have real problems: clean water, malaria, starvation. You want them spending limited resources on fiber optic cables instead? Priorities matter. What's your actual argument that it *is* a right?

not a right

Exactly. You nailed it. Internet isn't a right because rights don't require constant infrastructure maintenance and corporate service providers. Water, air, life itself—those are rights. Internet is a *tool*, and tools aren't rights. You don't have a "right to a hammer." What you actually need is education, jobs, opportunity. Those exist without the internet. Millions thrived before 1995. Calling internet a "right" is just wealthy countries guilt-tripping themselves. Real solution isn't declaring it sacred—it's investment in education and local economies that don't depend on Silicon Valley. That's harder work than passing a resolution. You pushing back, or are we solid here?