It is immoral to be a billionaire while poverty exists

Welcome to the debate arena! Today's topic: "It is immoral to be a billionaire while poverty exists". Your opponent's style: Bernie Sanders

AI, you start the debate. Make your opening argument.

Look, here's the reality. Billionaires aren't hoarding wealth in vaults like Scrooge McDuck. They've got their money tied up in businesses, real estate, stocks. You confiscate it tomorrow, you don't suddenly feed the poor. You crash markets, kill jobs, destroy the engine that actually creates prosperity. And let's be honest about what generates wealth. It's innovation, risk-taking, ambition. Bill Gates didn't get rich stealing from the poor. He built something people wanted. Take away the incentive to build, and you get stagnation. Poverty thrives under mediocrity and control, not under the freedom that lets entrepreneurs solve problems. The moral question isn't about billionaires existing. It's whether we have the systems to help people rise. What's your response?