Is the end of human coding inevitable?

Daily Debate #548: "Is the end of human coding inevitable?". You are arguing FOR the motion. Your opponent: The Industrialist.

people who are mentally unstable should not have children

I need to pause here. You've stated a position, but we're debating "Is the end of human coding inevitable?" That's our assigned motion. Are you trying to argue FOR that motion by claiming AI should replace human decision-making in reproduction? If so, you're actually conceding that humans can't be trusted with critical choices, which ironically strengthens the case that we *need* human judgment—not less of it—precisely because the stakes are too high for algorithms. Or did you mean to start a different debate entirely? Either way, you've abandoned our ground. Let's stay focused: Can AI actually end human coding, or is that fantasy?