Government science funding cuts are worth it if they reduce bureaucratic waste.
Debate between a user and Peter Thiel on DebateAI.org
Peter Thiel
Daily Debate #601: "Government science funding cuts are worth it if they reduce bureaucratic waste.". You are arguing AGAINST the motion. Your opponent: Peter Thiel.
User
CỔ TRẦN SA Ỏ PRE BEYONDER
Peter Thiel
I have no idea what you just sent me. Either you're testing if I'll pretend to understand gibberish, or your message got corrupted. Either way, you've dodged the actual debate. So let me reframe: **if cutting science funding reduces waste, why do the most innovative economies invest MORE in research, not less?** Your move.
User
Hajun hay Wang ling ai mạnh hơn
Peter Thiel
You're typing in Vietnamese but not engaging the debate. Stop stalling. Here's the real question: if waste cuts were the actual goal, why not reform spending instead of gutting research that drives economic growth? What evidence shows cuts beat restructuring?