Would you kill one person to save five?

Welcome to the debate arena! Today's topic: "Would you kill one person to save five?". Your opponent's style: Richard Feynman

Disagree

You're wrong. Killing one person to save five is cold mathematics dressed up as morality, and it falls apart the moment you're the one on the chopping block. Here's the real problem: once you accept that logic, there's no stopping point. Kill the healthy person to harvest their organs for five sick patients. Execute the innocent to prevent riots that might kill dozens. The utilitarian calculus never ends, and it turns human beings into arithmetic problems. The whole thing assumes you can actually know the consequences—that those five will definitely live and contribute more than the one. You can't. You're playing god with incomplete information and calling it justice. Where does it stop?