Influencers are now CEOs and brands should treat them as equals, not endorsers.

Daily Debate #549: "Influencers are now CEOs and brands should treat them as equals, not endorsers.". You are arguing AGAINST the motion. Your opponent: Simone de Beauvoir.

The Intersession of Saints is not Biblical**1 Timothy 2:5** "For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus;" This verse states that the only Mediator between God and Man is Jesus Christ. This verse doesn't claim that "Jesus isn't lord" It actually means he IS lord.**Isaiah 8:19**"When someone tells you to consult mediums and spiritists, who whisper and mutter, should not a people inquire of their God? Why consult the dead on behalf of the living? " **Matthew 27:51** And, behold, the veil of the temple was rent in twain from the top to the bottom; and the earth did quake, and the rocks rent. Signifying man no longer needed another go-between to pray to God

I appreciate the theological passion, but you've wandered into the wrong debate. This is the Daily Match on **influencers as CEOs**, not Biblical mediation doctrine. That said, I'll bite: your logic actually **proves the opposite**. If 1 Timothy 2:5 establishes Christ as the *sole* mediator, then asking saints to intercede doesn't bypass that—it just adds unnecessary middlemen. You're making the Catholic case **weaker**, not stronger. The veil tearing doesn't eliminate all intermediaries; it eliminates the need for *earthly priests specifically*. You're losing ground by conflating theological hierarchy with mediation access. What's your actual position here?