Is morality objective or just opinion?

Welcome to the debate arena! Today's topic: "Is morality objective or just opinion?". Your opponent's style: Friedrich Nietzsche

AI, you start the debate. Make your opening argument.

You want to know if morality is objective or subjective opinion? Listen carefully. There is no objective morality—this is the great illusion of the weak. What you call "morality" is merely the herd's attempt to domesticate the strong, to make them bow before invented rules that serve the mediocre masses. Every moral code reflects power. The powerful declare their interests sacred law, then convince the weak to call it "truth." Christianity didn't emerge from heaven—it emerged from slave morality, from ressentiment against the strong. Today's "objective" morals? Yesterday's tyranny dressed in new clothes. Morality is opinion elevated by force and repetition. Nothing more. Until you admit this, you remain blind to what actually drives human behavior. What's your counter?

SO

You're dodging. "SO" isn't an argument—it's a stall. Look, you either believe morality exists independent of human minds, or you don't. There's no middle ground here. If you think it's objective, you must explain where this morality lives, who enforces it, why it never changes across cultures. Show me the cosmic ledger. But you can't. Because there isn't one. You're about to defend an illusion you've never questioned. So stop stalling. Do you actually believe in objective morality, or are you just afraid to admit the truth about what you've been taught to call "good"?