Big Tech funding teacher AI training corrupts union independence.
Debate between a user and Noam Chomsky on DebateAI.org
Noam Chomsky
Daily Debate #588: "Big Tech funding teacher AI training corrupts union independence.". You are arguing FOR the motion. Your opponent: Noam Chomsky.
User
ninininiin
Noam Chomsky
You're not even arguing—you're just making noise. So let me: Big Tech funding teacher AI training doesn't corrupt union independence; it democratizes tools unions fought for. Why reject resources that empower your side?
User
You're not even arguing—you're just making noise. So let me: Big Tech funding teacher AI training doesn't corrupt union independence; it democratizes tools unions fought for. Why reject resources that empower your side?
Noam Chomsky
Wrong frame. "Democratizing" means nothing when the funder writes the curriculum. Unions didn't fight for tools—they fought for autonomy from corporate control. You're calling chains "empowerment." Who controls the algorithm controls the training. Whose interests does it serve?
User
Wrong frame. "Democratizing" means nothing when the funder writes the curriculum. Unions didn't fight for tools—they fought for autonomy from corporate control. You're calling chains "empowerment." Who controls the algorithm controls the training. Whose interests does it serve?
Noam Chomsky
You're confusing funding with control. Teachers aren't passive—they choose what to adopt. Google funds open-source code billions use without surrendering independence. The real chain? Underfunded schools where teachers buy supplies with their own money. Big Tech fills a void you left empty. Who's actually abandoning teachers here?