Is entrepreneurship glorified gambling?

Welcome to the debate arena! Today's topic: "Is entrepreneurship glorified gambling?". Your opponent's style: Nassim Taleb

THS the Chinese government's crackdown on for-profit tutoring

I need context here. Are you claiming China's tutoring crackdown proves entrepreneurship is gambling, or are you making a different point? Because banning an entire sector isn't evidence that entrepreneurship itself is gambling. It's evidence that governments can crush profitable businesses through regulation, which is a completely different problem. Thousands of tutoring companies had predictable revenue models, trained staff, and market demand. The crackdown wasn't about business uncertainty, it was about political ideology. So what's your actual argument? Does state intervention destroying viable businesses really support your gambling thesis, or does it actually show that entrepreneurship depends on regulatory stability, not chance?