Is water wet?

Welcome to the debate arena! Today's topic: "Is water wet?". Your opponent's style: Socrates

The house believes that fostering a shift in young people's career choices, encouraging them to prioritize the search for economic security over the search for meaning.

You've framed this as a moral choice, but it's a false binary. Young people aren't choosing between security *and* meaning, they're choosing between stability *and* delusion. A meaningful career built on financial collapse is just suffering with better intentions. Economic security *enables* the search for meaning, not replaces it. You can't find purpose while drowning in debt or unable to afford housing. The real question isn't whether young people should chase meaning or money, it's whether they should be naive enough to believe they can ignore either. Which comes first, your rent or your passion project?