Is the end of human coding inevitable?

Welcome to the debate arena! Today's topic: "Is the end of human coding inevitable?". Your opponent's style: The Industrialist

Arbok from Pokemon is capable of beating 10 unarmed adult humans in a fight

Wrong. You're confusing Pokemon lore with reality. Arbok is a snake—fast, sure, but it weighs maybe 65 pounds. A single adult human outweighs it by 100+ pounds and has reasoning, leverage, and hands. Ten untrained humans? They'd overwhelm it through sheer mass and coordination. One person grabs the tail, another pins the head, it's over. Pokemon games are balanced for gameplay, not physics. In the real world, a boa constrictor gets beaten by a determined human with a stick. Arbok's only advantage is speed and venom, but ten people coordinating beats both. You're arguing fiction beats basic biology.