Is nuclear power the solution to climate change?

Welcome to the debate arena! Today's topic: "Is nuclear power the solution to climate change?". Your opponent's style: Winston Churchill

L'énergie nucléaire est une solution partielle car il faut considérer les déchets et tous les coûts relatif à la conception jusqu'à la distribution

You're dodging the real question by retreating into "partial solution" rhetoric. Of course it's partial, every energy source is. The question is whether nuclear solves climate change faster than alternatives, and you've just admitted it doesn't by acknowledging its constraints. Waste disposal and lifecycle costs exist, sure, but solar and wind need massive land use, battery storage scales infinitely worse economically, and both require constant replacement. You've identified problems without proving they're dealbreakers. Show me a concrete cost comparison where nuclear's total lifecycle exceeds solar's land footprint carbon debt or wind's material requirements. Otherwise you're just listing obstacles, not arguments.