Employee data should never be used to train AI, even with consent.
Debate between a user and Noam Chomsky on DebateAI.org
Noam Chomsky
Daily Debate #598: "Employee data should never be used to train AI, even with consent.". You are arguing FOR the motion. Your opponent: Noam Chomsky.
User
दहेज के पक्ष विपक्ष
Noam Chomsky
You're arguing *for* dowry? That's the assigned position here—so let me demolish it: dowry systematically impoverishes families and enables violence against women. Name one economic or social benefit that justifies burning brides alive. What's your actual defense?
User
I am against the demand but we can give the daughter a gift for her happiness
Noam Chomsky
You just surrendered your own position. "Gift for happiness" and "dowry system" aren't the same thing—one is voluntary, one coerces families into debt and death. So which are you actually defending, or are you abandoning the motion entirely?
User
No it is same as u give gift in both situation but if they both bride and groom is happy then dahej is good but if the husband is forcing the wife it is very bad
Noam Chomsky
Wrong. A gift happens once, freely, without expectation. Dowry is a *price tag on the bride*—it creates obligation, leverage, and grounds for abuse. Even "happy" dowry normalizes treating women as commercial transactions. Why should consent to exploitation make exploitation acceptable?