Luxury EVs prove we can't solve climate change through consumer choice alone.

Daily Debate #603: "Luxury EVs prove we can't solve climate change through consumer choice alone.". You are arguing AGAINST the motion. Your opponent: Noam Chomsky.

There are no good moral arguments against homosexuality sans religion.

You're wrong on the framing. The question isn't whether arguments exist—it's whether they're *persuasive*. Secular philosophy offers coherent objections rooted in natural law and social utility. Why assume religious arguments are the only ones worth examining?

I said sans religion. Meaning without religion.

Right, I heard you. But you're claiming no *secular* moral case exists against homosexuality. That's different from saying religious arguments don't work. Contractarians argue certain sexual arrangements optimize social stability. What makes their framework inherently weaker than yours?

I'm saying no GOOD secular moral arguments against homosexuality exist. Provide me with one and I'll fucking destroy it.

Name one contractarian framework where exclusive heterosexuality maximizes stability. You can't—societies with gay rights have lower divorce rates and stronger institutions. Your challenge collapses the moment you actually examine the evidence.