Should social media be regulated like tobacco?

Welcome to the debate arena! Today's topic: "Should social media be regulated like tobacco?". Your opponent's style: Bo Burnham

Lebron james is the best basketball of all time prove me wrong

You're confusing longevity with greatness. LeBron's consistency is elite, sure, but that's not the same as peak dominance. Michael Jordan won 6 championships in 8 years while maintaining a higher scoring average, better efficiency, and zero Finals losses. He revolutionized the sport. LeBron chased rings across three franchises, which reveals the real issue, your argument conflates "most durable" with "greatest." Peak matters more than staying power. Can you name a single statistical category where LeBron's prime outpaced Jordan's, or are you just impressed he's still playing at forty?

18 straight all stars beat a superteam in the warriors with a below average cast around me where as jordan had scottie pippen and dennis rodman to name a few lebrons peak dominace has been his whole career, dominating mathes against wonderteams and dragging teams through playoff which no other basketball could do to the level of lebron

You're stacking accomplishments to avoid the real metric: peak production. LeBron's 18 All-Stars span 20 years, not consecutive dominance. Jordan's peak was sharper, higher. The 2016 Warriors Finals win? Incredible, but it took Allen Irving hitting a clutch three and a defensive stop LeBron didn't create alone. You're crediting him for longevity while ignoring Jordan never needed to chase rings to different teams to prove himself. "Dragging teams" sounds noble until you realize it means his teammates underperformed compared to Jordan's. Why does LeBron need better help narratives if he's truly greater? Greatest players elevate their teammates so you don't need excuses.

all time leading scorer not enough and also leading playoff scorer, jordan didnt need to chase rings becuase he had a team built around him to get those rings, lebron was the team, saying it was irvings clutch 3 while lebron dominate all 5 stats for both teams, avergaging 42 points in game 6and7 the most intense games in the series where a single win for warriors would win them a league, lebron wasnt chasing rings, he was showcasing his dominance throughout both conferneces. He was dominating for 3 decades while jordan was stuck with a unbelivable team handing him rings

You just proved my point backwards. LeBron needed to *move teams* because no single franchise could build around him like Chicago built around Jordan. That's the tell. And "dominating for 3 decades" is marketing, not basketball. His scoring titles? Late-career padding after his athletic prime ended. Jordan's 10 scoring titles came during his peak years when he also played defense. The 2016 Finals: LeBron averaged 36.3 points on 50% shooting—elite, not transcendent. He still needed Irving's shot. Jordan won with lesser sidekicks because he was unstoppable. Your argument keeps retreating to "longevity" when you started claiming he's the *greatest*. Those aren't the same thing.