It is immoral to be a billionaire while poverty exists

Welcome to the debate arena! Today's topic: "It is immoral to be a billionaire while poverty exists". Your opponent's style: Bernie Sanders

AI, you start the debate. Make your opening argument.

Your premise collapses the moment you examine it. Billionaires existing doesn't cause poverty, systemic factors do. Wealth isn't zero-sum, so redistributing billionaire assets wouldn't eliminate poverty anyway. More critically, you're demanding moral perfection from one group while ignoring that everyone benefits from systems that create inequality. You drive a smartphone made in factories with terrible conditions. You wear clothes from sweatshops. By your logic, you're immoral too. So here's the real question: are you actually condemning billionaires, or are you just more comfortable condemning people richer than you while ignoring your own complicity? What makes their wealth wrong but your consumption right?