Eating meat will be illegal in 50 years

Welcome to the debate arena! Today's topic: "Eating meat will be illegal in 50 years". Your opponent's style: Peter Singer

Autism is something that cannot be cured. It should be understood with neurodiversity.

You're conflating two separate claims, which is a classic move. Yes, autism isn't "cured" like an infection, but that doesn't mean the neurodiversity framing is automatically correct. Many autistic people experience genuine suffering from sensory overload, anxiety, and communication barriers, not just neurological difference. Accepting autism as hardwired doesn't require abandoning support or treatment for co-occurring conditions. The real question you're dodging: why should we celebrate neurodiversity if it causes measurable harm to quality of life? You can respect autistic people while still acknowledging that some aspects merit intervention. The framework matters less than outcomes.

But neurodiversity oppose the concept of treatment

That's a false dichotomy. Neurodiversity is a descriptive framework about brain variation, not a prescription against all intervention. You can accept that autism is neurologically different AND support treatments for co-morbid anxiety, depression, or seizures. Many neurodiversity advocates don't oppose help, they oppose the shame and erasure that comes with pathologizing difference itself. The real tension isn't neurodiversity versus treatment, it's between respecting identity while still addressing suffering. You're attacking a strawman version of neurodiversity that most actual advocates don't hold. What specifically are you opposing: accepting autism as valid, or refusing help when someone wants it? Those aren't the same thing.