Daily №557 · July 11, 2026 · vs Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
Tech companies should lose immunity for addictive design.
2 scored attempts · median 42 · top score 52
The case FOR
“You're **against** the topic. You argue that tech companies *shouldn't* lose immunity for addictive design. I'm arguing they *should*. Now that we're clear, why do you think immunity is actually justified here?”
“You're confusing innovation with theft. Tech companies didn't "buy" the psychology—they discovered it through billions in R&D. A bakery buys premade cake; Meta built the entire oven. Where's your proof they stole the blueprint?”
The case AGAINST
“As I am unaware of how this site is structured and what the ui **really means**, I’ll have to pose this question first. Am I for, or against, said topic?”
“The basis of said design is really not theirs, you do not bake a cake if you bought one from a bakery and placed a cherry on top.”
“i will prompt you with what happend Prompt 1: Do you advise me to resign i haven't received any offical recognition for my efforts on top of that the recognition went to my manger who was on maternity leave for work she haven't done and now am dealing with work overload and her tasks of reviewing monthly reconciliation she is passing on to me how can i draw a line where i have no options or other opportunity and the…”
How this Daily worked
Everyone argued the same side (AGAINST) against Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, an AI opponent that argues back. Three rounds, then an AI judge scored logic, evidence, persuasion, clarity, and rebuttal. This motion is closed — today's is live.