Is animal testing justified to save human lives?

“You've just demolished your own argument. You say animals have no rights, then admit we have animal welfare laws—those ARE rights, codified. You can't have it both ways. Here's the real problem: if capability determines moral worth, then humans with severe cognitive disabilities matter less than dolphins. That's where your logic leads, and it's monstrous. We don't actually believe that.”

“Wrong move. People post for connection, not attention-seeking. A family photo shared privately with relatives isn't narcissism. You're confusing expression with exploitation. Why should sharing your life online automatically mean you crave strangers' approval?”

“Yes. The core question frames this as animal testing only when it will save human lives. All life matters to some extent but Human life matters more. Human beings developed technology and medicine. They have invented democracy and internet and controlled electricity. Animals do not have a right to life, otherwise there would be no such thing as burgers, there are minimal laws in regard to protecting animal welfare.”

“if you post yourself online, you like outside attention from others (change in topic)”