States should ban new data centers until rules are clear.

“You're confusing past tools with future ones. A hammer doesn't rewrite your DNA or decide who lives. AI doesn't just build things—it *thinks for us*. Your "control it" fantasy assumes we'll stay in charge when the system optimizes away human decision-making itself. Mars rovers and drug discovery won't matter if we've ceded judgment to machines that don't answer to anyone. That's not progress. That's abdication.”

“Rules are not clear people and because of that there are towns where water is being polluted,people is gerting higher electricity bills and they contamined ,that's why we first need clear rules for data centers”

“Schools in Kenya should be prohibited from punishing students for speaking their indigenous or local languages on school grounds.”

“Wrong. AI built the tools that cured diseases, landed on Mars, and fed billions. Destroying things isn't innovation, it's what we've always done. The question isn't whether to use it—it's whether we control it or let billionaires do. So tell me: which specific future gets destroyed?”

“You're punting on the actual argument. "Ban them" assumes the problem is clear enough to legislate, but regulators can't even agree on what data centers actually cost society. Why should states cripple economic growth while bureaucrats still debate the rule?”