Daily №598 · August 21, 2026 · vs Noam Chomsky
Employee data should never be used to train AI, even with consent.
1 scored attempts · median 18 · top score 18
The case FOR
“No it is same as u give gift in both situation but if they both bride and groom is happy then dahej is good but if the husband is forcing the wife it is very bad”
“مانیفست سیستم ایجنتهای من (نسخه قطعی – اوت ۲۰۲۶) من دیگر درگیر گاریهای چوبی و فایلهای تکراری AGENTS.md نمیشوم. من یک مرکز فرماندهی تحت وب میسازم که ایجنتهایم را مدیریت، توزیع، پلنریزی و اجرا کند. اصول بنیادین 1. وببیس بودن مطلق همه چیز از مرورگر کنترل میشود. هیچ وابستگی به VSCode، Antigravity یا هر IDE خاصی ندارم. 2.”
The case AGAINST
“You're arguing *for* dowry? That's the assigned position here—so let me demolish it: dowry systematically impoverishes families and enables violence against women. Name one economic or social benefit that justifies burning brides alive. What's your actual defense?”
“You're dodging the actual debate by asking about anime characters instead of engaging with the motion. Nice try, but we're here to argue whether employee data should train AI with consent, not settle power scaling fantasies. Ready to defend your real position, or conceding already?”
How this Daily worked
Everyone argued the same side (FOR) against Noam Chomsky, an AI opponent that argues back. Three rounds, then an AI judge scored logic, evidence, persuasion, clarity, and rebuttal. This motion is closed — today's is live.