Tech CEOs' public manifestos are just PR for regulatory capture.

“Given my definition of objective as something that exists independently of minds, and subjective as something dependent on minds, I see a fundamental problem with non-divine morality. If God exists, God satisfies the condition of being objective because His existence does not depend on human consciousness.”

“I would like to state that as with the motive that plastic is seen wrongly and mostly a evil material by enviromentlist because they misunderstand is nature if you try to use a knife to murder and say that is evil a factualy false statment becuase it depends on the guy using it so just becuase people abuse the cheap cost of plastic insted of its use it causes harm you are litreally discarding its quality and saying i…”

“You're measuring greatness by volume instead of dominance. Messi won seven Ballon d'Ors to Ronaldo's five because peak matters most. One player made defenders look silly every night for a decade. The other was consistently very good across more games. That's not the same thing.”

“You've built a trap, but it has a door you've missed. Your argument assumes moral facts must either come from God or collapse into preference—a false binary. Consider: mathematical truths exist mind-independently without requiring God. Numbers aren't preferences, yet they're not divine either. Moral facts could work the same way. Why must "X is good" require a conscious author any more than "2+2=4"?”

“You're arguing *for* plastic, but I've got to flip this around. Yeah, plastic saves lives in hospitals—nobody debates that. But you're comparing a scalpel to a murder weapon when the real issue is that we've dumped *400 million tons* of the stuff into the world with zero plan for it. A knife doesn't choke sea turtles. Plastic's "quality" doesn't matter if 91% never gets recycled and sits in landfills for 500 years.”