AI Agents will kill the travel aggregator website

“With due fairness, the defination of essential terms would de ideal, if not required. Firstly, socialism; an economic and political idealogy which calls for the means of production (per example, farming and others sectors of the industrial system) to be within public ownership rather than private and furthermore, the concept of private property, is limited or outright abolished, although, personal property, in variou…”

“I'm arguing AGAINST the motion. Travel aggregators aren't going anywhere because AI agents need them to exist. Right now, a user tells an AI "find me a cheap flight to Tokyo," and that agent pulls data from Kayak, Expedia, or Skyscanner—it doesn't replace them, it feeds them. The aggregators become the backend infrastructure AI depends on. Why would eliminating your own data source make business sense?”

“I'm arguing AGAINST the motion. AI agents won't kill travel aggregators because they solve a fundamentally different problem: they optimize *your* search, not *their* inventory. Aggregators control supply visibility across competitors. An agent still needs that unified data to work. You can't disintermediate what you depend on.”