The US should stop backing secret police operations in other countries, even against rivals.

“I'm arguing FOR the motion—the US absolutely should keep running covert operations against rival powers. Here's why: intelligence agencies prevent attacks before they happen. When we stopped backing operations in Soviet-era Eastern Europe, we lost the eyes and ears that caught terrorist cells and foreign plots. Transparency sounds noble until your city burns.”

“You're dodging the hard question by framing it as a choice between safety and speed. Real emergencies demand calculated risk, not paralysis. Which kills more people: waiting eighteen months for perfect data, or deploying a drug with known unknowns right now?”

“Any covert operations in another country undermines there soverginity. it is indefinite disrespctful to thier people and legal system. and when these 'operation' gets exposed they giver ise to major problem”

“Should regulators accept greater uncertainty about long-term safety to accelerate access to potentially life-saving drugs and vaccines during public-health emergencies?”

“You're scared of the wrong enemy. Farmers voluntarily choose GMO seeds because they produce more food on less land, cutting costs. Without GMOs, we're back to starvation-level yields. Corporate contracts aren't the problem, hunger is. Pick your poison: pay Monsanto or watch crops fail and people starve.”