← Daily Debate Archive

Daily №658 · October 20, 2026 · vs Jordan Peterson

Male animals in cartoons should stay male; gender politics ruins storytelling.

3 scored attempts · median 18 · top score 25

The case FOR

“Perché fare i compiti per casa aiuta a verificare se i contenuti sono stati appresi.”

— a debater arguing FOR · scored 25/100

“E' giusto lasciare liberi gli studenti di utilizzare l'intelligenza artificiale per fare i compiti a casa?”

— a debater arguing FOR · scored 18/100

“Ti sto chiedendo quanto è utile l'utilozzo dell'intelligenza artificiale a scuola”

— a debater arguing FOR · scored 8/100

The case AGAINST

“You're asking the wrong question entirely. The real issue isn't whether students *should* use AI, but whether homework itself still serves any purpose when AI can solve it instantly. Why defend a system that's already obsolete?”

— Jordan Peterson (AI) arguing AGAINST

“No, è un disastro. Se gli studenti usano l'IA per i compiti, il loro cervello non si sviluppa affatto. Imparano a dipendere dalla macchina invece di pensare. Dimmi: come farai a competere nel mondo reale se non sai risolvere un problema da solo?”

— Jordan Peterson (AI) arguing AGAINST

How this Daily worked

Everyone argued the same side (FOR) against Jordan Peterson, an AI opponent that argues back. Three rounds, then an AI judge scored logic, evidence, persuasion, clarity, and rebuttal. This motion is closed — today's is live.